United States of America et al v. Fast Train II Corp., et al
Case Number: 1:2012cv21431
Filed: April 17, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Office: Miami Office
Presiding Judge: Marcia G. Cooke
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 226 OMNIBUS ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT granting 131 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 142 Motion for Summary Judgment. Closing Case. Motions Terminated: 178 MOTION for Leave to File filed by Alejandro Amor, 214 MOTION in Limine MOTION to Strike 207 Notice (Other), filed by Alejandro Amor, 210 MOTION for Hearing filed by Alejandro Amor, 188 Plaintiff's MOTION for Leave to File Unilaterally, (1) Pretrial Stipulation, (2) Statement of Legal Elem ents of Plaintiff's Claims and (3) Summary of Parties' Motions in Limine filed by United States of America, 154 Plaintiff's MOTION to Strike 141 Response in Opposition to Motion, 142 MOTION for Summary Judgment o f Defendants In Order to Effectuate Court's September 9, 2016 Endorsed Order [E.C.F. 143] filed by United States of America, 147 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Alejandro Amor, 215 MOTION for Hearing filed by Alejandro Amor, 180 MOTION to Exclude Testimony Or Exhibits As To Defendant's Financial State And Wealth filed by Alejandro Amor, 131 Plaintiff's MOTION for Summary Judgment With Supporting Memorandum of Law Against Defendants filed by U nited States of America, 196 Plaintiff's MOTION to Stay and MOTION to Continue Until After the Court Rules on the Parties' Summary Judgment Motions [E.C.F. 131 and E.C.F. 147] filed by United States of America, 179 MOTION to Limit Evidence filed by Alejandro Amor, 213 MOTION to Strike 185 Response in Opposition to Motion,, 204 Exhibit List, 187 Response to Motion,,, 203 Notice (Other),,,,,,,, 186 Plaintiff's MOTION in Limine (Con solidated) to (i) Estop Defendant from Denying Essential Elemen filed by Alejandro Amor, 184 MOTION for Hearing filed by Alejandro Amor, 182 MOTION in Limine filed by Alejandro Amor, 181 MOTION In Limine to Exclude All Evidence, Refere nces, Arguments or Inferences Relating to Defendant Amor's Criminal Proceeding and Conviction filed by Alejandro Amor, 195 Plaintiff's MOTION to Strike 194 Memorandum Plaintiffs Motion To Strike And/Or Opposition Response To D efendants Unauthorized Supplemental Summary Judgment Brief filed by United States of America, 201 MOTION to Strike 198 Reply to Response to Motion, 190 Notice (Other),,, filed by Alejandro Amor, 186 Plaintiff's MOTION in Li mine (Consolidated) to (i) Estop Defendant from Denying Essential Elements of the False Claims Act Claims; Exclude Defendants: (ii) Six-Credit Hour Eligibility Option Aargument; (iii) Double-Jeopardy and Eighth Amendment filed by United States o f America, 158 MOTION to Preclude Plaintiff's Qualifying and Introducing David Bartnicki as an Expert Witness re 157 Witness List filed by Alejandro Amor, 142 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Alejandro Amor. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 2/15/2017. (tm) NOTICE: If there are sealed documents in this case, they may be unsealed after 1 year or as directed by Court Order, unless they have been designated to be permanently sealed. See Local Rule 5.4 and Administrative Order 2014-69.
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America et al v. Fast Train II Corp., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?