United States of America v. $70,670.00 in U.S. Currency et al
| United States of America |
| $70,670.00 in U.S. Currency, $101,629.59 in U.S. Currency and $30,000.00 in U.S. Currency |
| Kurvas Secret by W, Wilson Colorado and Miladis Salgado |
| 1:2015cv23616 |
| September 28, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Miami Office |
| Miami-Dade |
| Darrin P. Gayles |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 0981 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
167
ORDER denying 139 Motion to Alter Judgment; denying 141 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 1/3/2018. (hmo)
|
|
Filing
104
ORDER Affirming and Adopting 92 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (ssd)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER granting 17 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Special Interrogatory Answers from Putative Claimants Colorado, Kurvas Secret, and Salgado; and denying 16 Motion for Protective Order (Claimants' Objection to Plaintiff United States' Notice of Service of Special Interrogatories and Deferral of Response to Claimants' Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Supplemental Rule G(6)). The Claimants shall serve the Plaintiff with their answers to the propounded Special Interrogatories no later than 2/3/2016. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 1/20/2016. (zvr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
