Burrow et al v. Forjas Taurus, S.A. et al
| William Burrow and Oma Louise Burrow |
| Forjas Taurus, S.A. and Braztech International, L.C. |
| 1:2016cv21606 |
| May 5, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Miami Office |
| Miami-Dade (Office: Miami) |
| James Lawrence King |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
138
FINAL RULE 54(B) JUDGMENT ON ALL CLASS CLAIMS; ORDER granting 132 Motion for Attorney Fees; granting 135 Motion for Approval of Final Settlement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 9/6/2019. See attached document for full details. (EGT)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 73 Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel; denying as moot 85 Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Evidence in Support of Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 8/10/2018. See attached document for full details. (js02)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Braztech's motion to consolidate this action with Suzanne M. Bedwell and Ernest D. Bedwell v. Braztech, case No. 1:17-cv-22335-EGT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 2/9/2018. (js02)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER granting 31 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 6/16/2017. (EGT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
