MSPA Claims 1, LLC v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
MSPA Claims 1, LLC |
Scottsdale Insurance Company |
1:2016cv22965 |
July 8, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Miami Office |
Miami-Dade (Office: Miami) |
Federico A. Moreno |
Medicare Act |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 ORDER Adopting 34 Report and Recommendations and granting 10 Motion to Remand; denying as moot 12 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying as moot 22 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Closing Case. Motions Terminated: 22 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 8 Amended Complaint filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company, 12 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS 8 Amended Complaint FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company, 10 Plaintiff's MOTION to Remand filed by MSPA Claims 1, LLC, 34 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 22 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 8 Amended Complaint filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company, 10 Plaintiff's MOTION to Remand filed by MSPA Claims 1, LLC, [12. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 8/29/2017. (mmd) NOTICE: If there are sealed documents in this case, they may be unsealed after 1 year or as directed by Court Order, unless they have been designated to be permanently sealed. See Local Rule 5.4 and Administrative Order 2014-69. |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.