H.M.B. Holdings, Ltd.
In Re: H.M.B. Holdings, Ltd.
Case Number: 1:2016mc24487
Filed: October 26, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Office: Miami Office
County: Miami-Dade (Office: Miami)
Presiding Judge: Kathleen M Williams
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1782
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. This matter is before the Court on Petitioner's notice of voluntary dismissal DE #6 . This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. All deadlines and hearings are CANCELED. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 11/7/2016. (mc) NOTICE: If there are sealed documents in this case, they may be unsealed after 1 year or as directed by Court Order, unless they have been designated to be permanently sealed. See Local Rule 5.4 and Administrative Order 2014-69.
November 4, 2016 Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal without prejudice by H.M.B. Holdings, Ltd. (Vitale, Michael)
October 27, 2016 Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT signed by : Natalia M. Querard. re #1 Application for Judicial Assistance/Letter Rogatory, Declaration of Natalia M. Querard by H.M.B. Holdings, Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit 24, #25 Exhibit 25, #26 Exhibit 26, #27 Exhibit 27, #28 Exhibit 28, #29 Exhibit 29, #30 Exhibit 30, #31 Exhibit 31, #32 Exhibit 32, #33 Exhibit 33, #34 Exhibit 34)(Vitale, Michael)
October 27, 2016 Filing 4 Statement of: Memorandum of Law in Support of Ex Parte Application for an Order to Conduct Discovery For Use In Foreign Proceedings Pursuant to 28 USC 1782 by H.M.B. Holdings, Ltd. re #1 Application for Judicial Assistance/Letter Rogatory, (Vitale, Michael)
October 27, 2016 Filing 3 Clerks Notice pursuant to 28 USC 636(c). Parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the attached form. (tpl)
October 27, 2016 Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams (tpl)
October 26, 2016 Filing 1 APPLICATION for Judicial Assistance Application for an Order Pursuant to 28 USC 1782 to Conduct Discovery For Use in Foreign Proceedings Application for an Order Pursuant to 28 USC 1782 to Conduct Discovery For Use in Foreign Proceedings. Filing fee $ 46.00 receipt number 113C-9201355, filed by H.M.B. Holdings, Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Text of Proposed Order Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Vitale, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: H.M.B. Holdings, Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
In re: H.M.B. Holdings, Ltd.
Represented By: Michael S. Vitale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?