Marshall v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
Douglas Marshall |
Florida Department of Corrections and Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections |
1:2017cv23709 |
October 11, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Miami Office |
Miami-Dade (Office: Miami) |
Robert N Scola |
Patrick A White |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 PETITION for Evidentiary Hearing by Douglas Marshall. (vp) |
Filing 5 PETITION for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction by Douglas Marshall. Responses due by 10/25/2017 (vp) |
Filing 4 PETITION to Enforce Title 42 USC 2000 by Douglas Marshall. Responses due by 10/25/2017 (vp) |
Filing 3 Clerks Notice of Magistrate Judge Assignment to Magistrate Judge Patrick A. White. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2003-19 for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. (vp) |
Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr (vp) |
Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 2000 against Florida Department of Corrections, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections. Filing fee $ 350.00 due, filed by Douglas Marshall. (Attachments: #1 Complaint continued, #2 Summon(s))(vp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.