Perez v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Yodalis Irianne Perez |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2018cv20760 |
| February 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Miami Office |
| Miami-Dade (Office: Miami) |
| Robert N Scola |
| Edwin G Torres |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0416 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Yodalis Irianne Perez (Attachments: #1 Summon(s) 1, #2 Summon(s) 2, #3 Summon(s) 3, #4 Supplement USM-285 1, #5 Supplement USM-285 2, #6 Supplement USM-285 3) (Teplicki, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Appointment of Special Process Server by Yodalis Irianne Perez. Responses due by 3/14/2018 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Teplicki, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Yodalis Irianne Perez. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Teplicki, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 3
Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. No IFP Motion filed/Filing fees not paid. Filer is instructed to either file IFP Motion OR a Notice of Compliance of Filing Fee, and electronically pay the correct fees of $400.00 within 24 hours of this notice. (ail)
|
|
Filing 2
Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr and Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pursuant to the Clerks directive of this cause, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ail)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill. Filing fees $ 400.00. IFP Filed, filed by Yodalis Irianne Perez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D)(Teplicki, Joseph)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Perez v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Noticing Social Security US Attorney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Yodalis Irianne Perez | |
| Represented By: | Joseph Teplicki |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
