Alexander Estrada v. Ford Motor Company et al
| Alexander Estrada |
| Ford Motor Company, Sunroad Auto LLC, Does 1 through 20, inclusive and Sunroad Auto LLC doing business as Kearny Pearson Ford and Kia |
| Roes, Takata Corporation and TK Holdings Inc. |
| 1:2018cv21296 |
| April 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Miami Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Federico A Moreno |
| Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case Stayed / Closing Case. Per #18 Order Staying Case. (gp) NOTICE: If there are sealed documents in this case, they may be unsealed after 1 year or as directed by Court Order, unless they have been designated to be permanently sealed. See Local Rule 5.4 and Administrative Order 2014-69. |
Filing 18
ORDER Staying Case, Closing Case for Statistical Purposes, and Placing Matter in a Civil Suspense File. Case No. 18-21296-CV-MORENO is STAYED. All future pleadings shall be filed under both Case No. 14-24009-CV-MORENO and Master File No. 15-2599-MD-MORENO. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 4/16/2018. This Document relates to: 1:15-md-02599-FAM, 1:14-cv-24009-FAM, 1:18-cv-21296-FAM (gp)
|
| Filing 17 MDL Transfer In Cases Receipt from District of California Central. CAC 2 18-01652 Ryan Davis v. Ford Motor Company et al. Assigned FLSD Case No. 18-cv-21288-FAM; CAC 2 18-01653 Pedro M Melendrez et al v. Ford Motor Company et al. Assigned FLSD Case No. 18-cv-21290-FAM; CAC 2 18-01654 Adam Weber v. Ford Motor Company et al. Assigned FLSD Case No. 18-cv-21291-FAM; CAC 2 18-01655 Jerome Mostero v. Ford Motor Company et al. Assigned FLSD Case No. 18-cv-21292-FAM; CAC 2 18-01657 Danielle Dismone v. Ford Motor Company et al. Assigned FLSD Case No. 18-cv-21293-FAM; CAC 2 18-01660 Michael Nevieus v. Ford Motor Company et al. Assigned FLSD Case No. 18-cv-21294-FAM; CAC 2 18-01663 James Roy Niskanen et al v. Ford Motor Company et al. Assigned FLSD Case No. 18-cv-21295-FAM; CAC 2 18-01666 Alexander Estrada v. Ford Motor Company et al. Assigned FLSD Case No. 18-cv-21296-FAM; CAC 2 18-01667 Dorian Roberts v. Ford Motor Company et al. Assigned FLSD Case No. 18-cv-21297-FAM; CAC 2 18-01668 Higinio Llamas v. Ford Motor Company, et al. Assigned FLSD Case No. 18-cv-21298-FAM. Re: FLSD MDL Case Number 1:15-md-02599-FAM. (gp) |
| Filing 16 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Federico A. Moreno and Magistrate Judge Lauren Fleischer Louis. (gp) |
| Filing 15 Case transferred in from California Central; Case Number 2:18-cv-01666. Electronic file including transfer order and docket sheet received. (gp) |
| Filing 14 Conditional Transfer Order - 75 from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL 2599, transferring case to USDC, Southern District of Florida and assigned to Honorable Federico A. Moreno 75 for the coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant top USC 28 Section 1407. Case transferred electronically. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) Associated Cases: 2:18-cv-01613-DDP-JEM et al. (shb) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by plaintiff Alexander Estrada. Motion set for hearing on 4/30/2018 at 10:00 AM before Judge Dean D. Pregerson. (Barry, David) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Counsel are encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. The address is http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov. It is not necessary to clear a motion date with the Court Clerk prior to filing the motion. The Court hears motions only on Mondays at 10:00 a.m. See order for further details. (shb)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 16-05-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:18-cv-01613 DDP(JEMx). Case transferred from Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish to Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-01666 DDP(JEMx). Signed by Judge Dean D. Pregerson (rn)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, Sunroad Auto LLC. (Arens, Mary) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, Sunroad Auto LLC. Related Case(s): 2:18-cv- 01613 (Arens, Mary) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 20, inclusive, Ford Motor Company, Sunroad Auto LLC. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Alexander Estrada. Filed in State Court on 6/29/16 Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal (car) |
| UNCONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to First Amended Complaint by Defendant Ford Motor Company. Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal(car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 20, inclusive, Ford Motor Company, Sunroad Auto LLC amending Complaint - (Discovery),, filed by Plaintiff Alexander Estrada. Filed in State Court on 11/14/2016 Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal(car) |
| UNCONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to First Amended Complaint by Defendant Sunroad Auto LLC. Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal(car) |
| THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT (FILED AS CROSS-CLAIM IN STATE COURT) against Third-Party Defendants Takata Corporation, TK Holdings, Inc., ROES 1 through 20, inclusive; Jury Demanded. Filed in State Court on 6/23/17, filed by Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff Ford Motor Company. Submitted with attachment 1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal (car) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, Sunroad Ford, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice (Other) #2 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #4 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on 2/28/2018. (Arens, Mary) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, Sunroad Ford. (Arens, Mary) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, (Arens, Mary) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE Pendency of Other Actions filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, Sunroad Ford. (Arens, Mary) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number BC625340 Receipt No: 0973-21329973 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, Sunroad Ford. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court File, #2 Exhibit BK Order, #3 Declaration MLA Declaration) (Attorney Mary Lynn Arens added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft), Attorney Mary Lynn Arens added to party Sunroad Ford (pty:dft))(Arens, Mary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
