Aligned Bayshore Holdings, LLC v. Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company
Aligned Bayshore Holdings, LLC |
Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company |
1:2018cv21692 |
April 27, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Miami Office |
Miami-Dade (Office: Miami) |
Edwin G. Torres |
Robert N. Scola |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 168 Order to Show Cause Why This Case Should Not Be Dismissed for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. Show Cause Response due by 5/15/2020. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 5/8/2020. See attached document for full details. (kpe) |
Filing 153 ORDER on Parties' Renewed Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. Ordergranting 125 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 126 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 141 Motion to Strike ; denying as moot 144 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 2/5/2020. See attached document for full details. (kpe) |
Filing 122 ORDER Adopting Magistrate Judge's 79 Order. Order overruling Defendant's 112 Objections; denying 65 Motion for Leave to Amend. Dispositive Motions due by 12/6/2019. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 11/14/2019. See attached document for full details. (kpe) |
Filing 109 ORDER On Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. Order granting in part and denying in part 89 Motion for Reconsideration and to Vacate Final Judgment; denying as moot 92 Motion to Strike the Motion for Reconsideration. The Clerk is directed to reopen this case. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 9/12/2019. See attached document for full details. (kpe) |
Filing 86 ORDER on Cross Motions for Summary Judgment. Order granting 48 Motion for Partial Summary judgment; denying 49 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court therefore directs the Clerk to close this case and to remove it from the trial calendar. Any pending motions in this case are denied as moot. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 6/17/2019. See attached document for full details. (kpe) |
Filing 79 ORDER denying 65 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 6/3/2019. See attached document for full details. (abu) |
Filing 38 Order on Defendants Motion to Dismiss Count II of the AmendedComplaint and Motion to Strike. ORDER granting in part and denying in part 20 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 12/10/2018. See attached document for full details. (kpe) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Aligned Bayshore Holdings, LLC v. Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Aligned Bayshore Holdings, LLC | |
Represented By: | Stephen A. Marino, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.