Ariza Larrinua v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Alberto Ariza Larrinua
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2018cv23073
Filed: July 27, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Office: Miami Office
Presiding Judge: Marcia G Cooke
Referring Judge: Jonathan Goodman
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 31, 2018 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (jas)
July 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ENDORSED ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. USM Service NOT Ordered. Based on the short form application to proceed in forma pauperis that Plaintiff filed under penalty of perjury [ECF No. 3], the Undersigned concludes that Plaintiff cannot pay the filing fee in this case. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Therefore, the Undersigned grants Plaintiff's application to proceed without prepayment of fees. Plaintiff shall have until August 6, 2018, to indicate if service by the U.S. Marshal is requested for the complaint and summonses, once the summonses are filed on the docket. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 7/30/2018. (jdo)
July 27, 2018 Filing 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) cannot be issued. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is pending (jas)
July 27, 2018 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Alberto Ariza Larrinua. (jas)
July 27, 2018 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Marcia G. Cooke and Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pursuant to the Clerks directive of this cause, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jas)
July 27, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fees $ 400.00. IFP Filed, filed by Alberto Ariza Larrinua. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 IFP Application)(Palacios-Paredes, Katherine)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ariza Larrinua v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Noticing Social Security US Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alberto Ariza Larrinua
Represented By: Katherine Olivia Palacios-Paredes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?