Rodriguez v. Department of Corrections
| Arturo Eduardo Rodriguez |
| Department of Corrections |
| 1:2018cv23470 |
| August 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Cecilia M Altonaga |
| Patrick A White |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE by Department of Corrections of filing state trial transcripts (Exhibit 5-8) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 5, #2 Exhibit 6, #3 Exhibit 7, #4 Exhibit 8) (Rodriguez, Magaly) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE by Department of Corrections of filing state trial transcripts (exibits 1-4) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4) (Rodriguez, Magaly) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Department of Corrections. (Attachments: #1 Appendix 1)(Rodriguez, Magaly) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Magaly Rodriguez on behalf of Department of Corrections. Attorney Magaly Rodriguez added to party Department of Corrections(pty:dft). (Rodriguez, Magaly) |
Filing 6
NEW-MODIFIED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 28 U.S.C. 2254 on or before forty-five days from the date of this orderthe respondent shall file a memorandum of fact and law to show cause why this petition should not be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patrick A. White on 8/28/2018. See attached document for full details. (fbn)
|
|
Filing 5
INITIAL ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE LITIGANT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patrick A. White on 8/28/2018. See attached document for full details. (fbn)
|
|
Filing 4
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. USM Service NOT Ordered. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patrick A. White on 8/28/2018. (jbr)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Arturo Eduardo Rodriguez. (kpe) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga and Magistrate Judge Patrick A. White. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2003-19, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. (kpe) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION/PETITION (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Filing fee $ 5.00. IFP Filed, filed by Arturo Eduardo Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(kpe) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rodriguez v. Department of Corrections | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Department of Corrections | |
| Represented By: | Noticing 2254 SAG Miami-Dade/Monroe |
| Represented By: | Magaly Rodriguez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Arturo Eduardo Rodriguez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
