Luxottica Group S.p.A. v. Archidesign Construction Corp.
Luxottica Group S.p.A. |
Archidesign Construction Corp. |
1:2018cv23551 |
August 30, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Robert N Scola |
Edwin G Torres |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 44 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Order Closing Case) (ail) |
Filing 10 Order Administratively Closing Case Upon Notice Of Settlement Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 10/4/2018. See attached document for full details. (ail) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Settlement by Luxottica Group S.p.A. (Rosemberg, David) |
Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE re #7 Order On Clerks Default Procedure (vmz) |
Filing 7 ORDER On Clerks Default Procedure, ( Motions due by 10/5/2018.) Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 9/28/2018. See attached document for full details. (vmz) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline by Luxottica Group S.p.A.. Archidesign Construction Corp. served on 9/5/2018, answer due 9/26/2018. (Rosemberg, David) |
Filing 5 ORDER SETTING DISCOVERY PROCEDURES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 9/11/2018. See attached document for full details. (mdc) |
Filing 4 Order Requiring Discovery and Scheduling Conference and ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres for Discovery Matters. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. on 8/30/2018. See attached document for full details. (ls) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Archidesign Construction Corp.. (ail) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ail) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Archidesign Construction Corp.. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-10955881, filed by Luxottica Group S.p.A.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Rosemberg, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Luxottica Group S.p.A. v. Archidesign Construction Corp. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Luxottica Group S.p.A. | |
Represented By: | David B. Rosemberg |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Archidesign Construction Corp. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.