Petigny v. Wal-Mart Stores, East, LP. et al
| Evelyne Petigny |
| WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP., James Reinard and Rachelle Pericles |
| 1:2018cv23762 |
| September 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Federico A Moreno |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 REPLY to #13 Response in Opposition to Motion, to Dismiss by WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP.. (Smith, Schuyler) |
| Filing 17 REPLY to Response to Motion re #9 Plaintiff's MOTION to Remand to State Court and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Evelyne Petigny. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Lazar, Scott) |
| Filing 16 REPLY to Response to Motion re #6 MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Rachelle Pericles. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Chiari Filing)(Smith, Schuyler) |
| Filing 15 REPLY to Response to Motion re #7 MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by James Reinard. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Chiari Filing)(Smith, Schuyler) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 Plaintiff's MOTION to Remand to State Court and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Rachelle Pericles, James Reinard, WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP.. Replies due by 11/2/2018. (Smith, Schuyler) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal with Prejudice #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), filed by Evelyne Petigny. Replies due by 11/2/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits to Opposition)(Lazar, Scott) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Evelyne Petigny. Replies due by 10/26/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Lazar, Scott) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Evelyne Petigny. Replies due by 10/26/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Lazar, Scott) |
| Filing 10 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by Rachelle Pericles, James Reinard, WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Smith, Schuyler) |
| Filing 9 Plaintiff's MOTION to Remand to State Court and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Evelyne Petigny. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Motion to Remand Exhibits, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order on Motion to Remand)(Lazar, Scott) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal with Prejudice #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), by WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP.. Responses due by 10/25/2018 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Schuyler) |
| Filing 7 MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by James Reinard. Attorney Schuyler Analise Smith added to party James Reinard(pty:dft). Responses due by 10/19/2018 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Schuyler) |
| Filing 6 MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Rachelle Pericles. Attorney Schuyler Analise Smith added to party Rachelle Pericles(pty:dft). Responses due by 10/19/2018 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Schuyler) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Entry of Parties Listed on 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case, into CM/ECF. NOTE: New Filer(s) will appear twice, since they are also a new party in the case. New Filer(s)/Party(s): James Reinard and Rachelle Pericles. (Smith, Schuyler) |
| Filing 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Parties Not Added. The Filer failed to add all parties associated with the case.Filer is instructed to add the additional parties by filing a Notice of Entry of Parties. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (pes) |
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Parties Improperly Formatted. The Filer failed to enter the party names in accordance with the CM/ECF Format for Adding Parties for Attorneys Guide. The correction was made. It is not necessary to re-file the document. (pes) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Federico A. Moreno. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (pes) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-10991545, filed by WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Exhibit M)(Smith, Schuyler) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
