Ribeiro v. SESSIONS et al
| Gilberto Ribeiro |
| Secretary DHS Kristjen Michele Nielsen, Acting Director James McCament, Acting Director Ronald D. Vitiello, Attorney General JEFFERSON B SESSIONS and Jefferson B. Sessions |
| 1:2018cv23766 |
| September 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Ursula Ungaro |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING Petition (D.E. 1) ; Denying as moot #3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Saher Joseph Macarius. Filing Fee $ 75.00 Receipt # 113C-10993149 filed by Gilberto Ribeiro; Closing Case. Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 9/14/2018. See attached document for full details. (ls)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Saher Joseph Macarius. Filing Fee $ 75.00 Receipt # 113C-10993149 by Gilberto Ribeiro. Responses due by 9/27/2018 (Hashish, Lawrence) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Ursula Ungaro (lh) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION/PETITION (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus . Filing fee $ 5.00 receipt number 113C-10992133, filed by Gilberto Ribeiro. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(Hashish, Lawrence) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
