Jones v. Emerald Construction Corp.
Plaintiff: Amanda Jones
Defendant: Emerald Construction Corp
Case Number: 1:2018cv23833
Filed: September 17, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Federico A Moreno
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 12, 2018 Filing 9 NOTICE of Mediator Selection. Added Amanda Jones, Karen Evans. (Georges-Pierre, Anthony)
October 12, 2018 Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Parties by Amanda Jones (Georges-Pierre, Anthony)
October 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. Mediation Deadline 3/28/2019. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 10/10/2018. See attached document for full details. (koa)
October 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SCHEDULING ORDER: Jury Trial is set for the two-week period starting 5/28/2019 before Judge Federico A. Moreno. Calendar Call is set for 5/21/2019 at 2:00 PM before Judge Federico A. Moreno. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 10/10/2018. See attached document for full details. (koa) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
October 8, 2018 Filing 5 STATUS REPORT for Removal by Emerald Construction Corp (Currier, Romin)
October 5, 2018 Filing 4 Notice of Court Practice in Removal Cases. The removing party is directed to file a Removal Status Report no later than October 19, 2018. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 10/5/2018. See attached document for full details. (koa)
October 2, 2018 Filing 3 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Emerald Construction Corp. (Currier, Romin)
September 17, 2018 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Federico A. Moreno. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jas)
September 17, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11001602, filed by Emerald Construction Corp. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons, #2 Exhibit B - All docs filed)(Currier, Romin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Emerald Construction Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda Jones
Represented By: Max Lloyd Horowitz
Represented By: Anthony Maximillien Georges-Pierre
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Emerald Construction Corp
Represented By: Romin N. Currier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?