Pineda v. Teleclaro, LLC
| Cesar Pineda |
| Teleclaro, LLC |
| 1:2018cv23854 |
| September 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jose E Martinez |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint by Teleclaro, LLC. Responses due by 11/20/2018 (Garcia, Ray) |
Filing 10
PAPERLESS ORDER denying as moot Defendant Teleclaro, LLC's #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint in light of the Court's order 9 . Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 10/17/2018. (jza)
|
|
Filing 9
PAPERLESS ORDER granting in part Defendant Teleclaro, LLC's #8 Amended Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant Teleclaro, LLC shall file its response to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before November 6, 2018. This order shall affect no other deadlines. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 10/17/2018. (jza)
|
| Filing 8 Amended MOTION for Extension of Time TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT re #3 Summons Issued by Teleclaro, LLC. Responses due by 10/31/2018 (Garcia, Ray) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT re #5 Summons Returned Executed by Teleclaro, LLC. Responses due by 10/31/2018 (Garcia, Ray) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Ray Garcia on behalf of Teleclaro, LLC. Attorney Ray Garcia added to party Teleclaro, LLC(pty:dft). (Garcia, Ray) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline by Cesar Pineda. Teleclaro, LLC served on 9/24/2018, answer due 10/15/2018. (Hindi, Jibrael) |
|
Filing 4
Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 9/25/2018. See attached document for full details. (dq)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Teleclaro, LLC. (dj) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (dj) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Teleclaro, LLC. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11006774, filed by Cesar Pineda. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Hindi, Jibrael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pineda v. Teleclaro, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cesar Pineda | |
| Represented By: | Jibrael Jarallah Said Hindi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Teleclaro, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Ray Garcia |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
