OLAPLEX, LLC et al v. PAYLESS BEAUTY, INC. et al
LIQWD, INC. and OLAPLEX, LLC |
PAYLESS BEAUTY, INC. and BRITTANY POLLACK |
1:2018cv23877 |
September 20, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Marcia G Cooke |
Jonathan Goodman |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. § 1114 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time Related to the Joint Scheduling Report by PAYLESS BEAUTY, INC., BRITTANY POLLACK. Responses due by 11/29/2018 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Woodard, Jonathan) |
Filing 20 ENDORSED ORDER granting #19 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Answer to a Complaint. Defendants must respond to Complaint by November 27, 2018. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 11/13/2018. (chd) |
Filing 19 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint, by PAYLESS BEAUTY, INC., BRITTANY POLLACK. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Woodard, Jonathan) |
Filing 18 ENDORSED ORDER granting #17 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Answer to a Complaint. Defendants must respond to the Complaint by November 12, 2018. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 10/29/2018. (chd) |
Filing 17 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint, by PAYLESS BEAUTY, INC., BRITTANY POLLACK. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Trial Set for October 29, 2018 in Badia v. Gel, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Woodard, Jonathan) |
Filing 16 ENDORSED ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time. Parties must file their Joint Scheduling Report by November 19, 2018. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 10/22/2018. (chd) |
Filing 15 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; granting #13 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 10/22/2018. See attached document for full details. (chd) |
Filing 14 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Extend Deadlines Related to Joint Scheduling Report by LIQWD, INC., OLAPLEX, LLC. Responses due by 11/2/2018 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Friedland, David) |
Filing 13 Agreed MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by LIQWD, INC., OLAPLEX, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Friedland, David) |
Filing 12 ENDORSED ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to a Complaint. Defendants must respond to the Complaint by October 29, 2018. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 10/16/2018. (chd) |
Filing 11 ENDORSED ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Motion #8 Plaintiff's MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. Defendant must respond to Plaintiffs' Motion by October 22, 2018. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 10/16/2018. See attached document for full details. (chd) |
Filing 10 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #8 Plaintiff's MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by PAYLESS BEAUTY, INC., BRITTANY POLLACK. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Woodard, Jonathan) |
Filing 9 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint, by PAYLESS BEAUTY, INC., BRITTANY POLLACK. Attorney Jonathan Ray Woodard added to party PAYLESS BEAUTY, INC.(pty:dft), Attorney Jonathan Ray Woodard added to party BRITTANY POLLACK(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Woodard, Jonathan) |
Filing 8 Plaintiff's MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by LIQWD, INC., OLAPLEX, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Vining, Jaime) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline by OLAPLEX, LLC, LIQWD, INC.. PAYLESS BEAUTY, INC. served on 9/24/2018, answer due 10/15/2018. (Vining, Jaime) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline by OLAPLEX, LLC, LIQWD, INC.. BRITTANY POLLACK served on 9/24/2018, answer due 10/15/2018. (Vining, Jaime) |
Filing 5 ORDER OF REFERRAL AND ORDER REGARDING COURT PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES. Referring Case to Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman for Pretrial Non-Dispositive Matters; Notice re Joint Motions; Expedited Service Deadline 11/19/2018. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 9/20/2018. See attached document for full details. (chd) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (cbr) |
Filing 3 FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (cbr) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Marcia G. Cooke. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cbr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Trademark Counterfeiting, Trademark Infringement and Related Claims against PAYLESS BEAUTY, INC., BRITTANY POLLACK. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11010789, filed by OLAPLEX, LLC, LIQWD, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) for PAYLESS BEAUTY, INC., #3 Summon(s) for BRITTANY POLLACK)(Vining, Jaime) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.