Del Rio v. State of Florida
| Norberto Del Rio |
| State of Florida |
| 1:2018cv23945 |
| September 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jose E Martinez |
| Alicia M Otazo-Reyes |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to State of Florida. (mc) |
Filing 6
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes for for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters, and for a Report and Recommendation on all dispositive matters. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 9/25/2018. See attached document for full details. (pes)
|
|
Filing 5
Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 9/25/2018. See attached document for full details. (dq)
|
| Filing 4 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 9/25/2018 in the amount of $ 400.00, receipt number FLS100173224. (vt) |
| Filing 3 Clerk's Notice of Filing Deficiency Re: #1 Complaint, filed by Norberto Del Rio. Case not filed with required filing fees of $400.00 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1914(a), and the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Summons(es) will not be issued until the filing fee is paid or an order granting the Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is entered. (kpe) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (kpe) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against State of Florida, filed by Norberto Del Rio. Filing fees $ 400.00. NOT PAID/ NO IFP FILED. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit)(kpe) (Attachment 8 replaced due to being unable to read clearly on 9/26/2018) (nc). Modified docket text on 9/26/2018 (nc). (Main Document 1 replaced due to missing the return address envelope on 9/26/2018) (nc). Modified docket text 9/26/2018 (nc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Del Rio v. State of Florida | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: State of Florida | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Norberto Del Rio | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
