Yanes v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Jesus Angel Yanes
Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2018cv23973
Filed: September 26, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Edwin G Torres
Referring Judge: Kathleen M Williams
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0416
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 30, 2018 Filing 8 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by Jesus Angel Yanes. US Attorney served on 10/26/2018, answer due 12/26/2018. (jas)
October 11, 2018 Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE of Compliance re #5 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. USM Service ordered . Summonses provided for issuance by Clerk for USM Service, Re: #1 Complaint. (Summons hand delivered to US Marshal Service). (jas)
October 11, 2018 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner, Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (jas)
October 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. USM Service ordered . Summonses provided for issuance by Clerk for USM Service Re: #1 Complaint filed by Jesus Angel Yanes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 10/10/2018. See attached document for full details. (EGT)
September 26, 2018 Filing 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) cannot be issued. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is pending. (jas)
September 26, 2018 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jesus Angel Yanes. (jas)
September 26, 2018 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams and Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pursuant to the Clerks directive of this cause, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jas)
September 26, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Jesus Angel Yanes against Nancy A. Berryhill. Filing fees $ 400.00. IFP Filed, filed by Jesus Angel Yanes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Forma Pauperis, #3 Summon(s))(Oliver, Rogelio)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Yanes v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Represented By: Noticing Social Security US Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jesus Angel Yanes
Represented By: Rogelio Ramon Oliver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?