Johnson v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, LTD.
Robert Johnson |
Royal Caribbean Cruises, LTD. |
1:2018cv24041 |
October 2, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Marcia G Cooke |
Jonathan Goodman |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by Robert Johnson (Schwartz, Mark) |
Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Parties/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Royal Caribbean Cruises, LTD. identifying Other Affiliate Paul Hehir for Royal Caribbean Cruises, LTD. (Alcivar, Natasha) |
Filing 7 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Royal Caribbean Cruises, LTD.. Attorney Natasha K. Alcivar added to party Royal Caribbean Cruises, LTD.(pty:dft). (Alcivar, Natasha) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline by Robert Johnson. Royal Caribbean Cruises, LTD. served on 10/9/2018, answer due 10/30/2018. (Schwartz, Mark) |
Filing 5 ORDER OF REFERRAL AND ORDER REGARDING COURT PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 10/9/2018. See attached document for full details. (ecz) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Royal Caribbean Cruises, LTD.. (ail) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) for Defendant, Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. by Robert Johnson re #1 Complaint, filed by Robert Johnson (Schwartz, Mark) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Marcia G. Cooke. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (bb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Royal Caribbean Cruises, LTD. Filing fees $ 400.00. Pay.gov Agency Tracking ID 113C-11039010, payment transferred from : 18-24029 Robert Johnson v Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd, filed by robert johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Schwartz, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Johnson v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, LTD. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Robert Johnson | |
Represented By: | Mark Kelley Schwartz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Royal Caribbean Cruises, LTD. | |
Represented By: | Natasha K. Alcivar |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.