Yip v. Cadwalader, Wickerman & Taft LLP
| Maria Yip |
| Cadwalader, Wickerman & Taft LLP, Greene Espel PLLP and Grant Thrornton LLP |
| 1:2018cv24253 |
| October 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Ursula Ungaro |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 Acknowledgment of Receipt of NOA from USCA re #16 Notice of Appeal, filed by Cadwalader, Wickerman & Taft LLP. Date received by USCA: 11/29/2018. USCA Case Number: 18-14978-EE. (apz) |
| Filing 17 Clerks Notice to Filer re #16 Notice of Appeal. Document Not Linked; ERROR - The filed document was not linked to the related docket entry. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document. (hh) |
| Filing 16 Notice of Appeal by Cadwalader, Wickerman & Taft LLP. re: #14 Order, Filing fee $ 505.00 receipt number 113C-11198738. Within fourteen days of the filing date of a Notice of Appeal, the appellant must complete the Eleventh Circuit Transcript Order Form regardless of whether transcripts are being ordered [Pursuant to FRAP 10(b)]. For information go to our FLSD website under Transcript Information. (Plasencia, Rebecca) (linked docket entry number) Text Modified on 11/29/2018 (hh). |
| Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re #16 Notice of Appeal, Notice has been electronically mailed. (hh) |
| Filing 15 REPLY to #13 Response/Reply (Other), Defendant/Appellant Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP's Reply to Plaintiff/Appellee Maria Yip's Response to Motion for Leave to Appeal Order Denying Motion to Compel Arbitration by Cadwalader, Wickerman & Taft LLP. (Casal, Jose) |
Filing 14
ORDER denying #6 Motion to Expedite; denying #6 Motion to Stay; denying #12 Emergency Motion/Certification of Emergency for Temporary Extension of Existing Stay Pending Adjudication of Expedited Motion for Stay Pending Appeal of Order Denying Motion to Compel Arbitration. Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 10/31/2018. See attached document for full details. (jas)
|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE to #1 Bankruptcy Motion (Complaint) for Leave to File Appeal of Bankruptcy Order by Maria Yip. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P, #17 Exhibit Q, #18 Exhibit R, #19 Exhibit S)(Gassenheimer, James) |
| Filing 12 Defendant's EMERGENCY MOTION with Certification of Emergency attached by Cadwalader, Wickerman & Taft LLP. Responses due by 11/13/2018 (Attachments: #1 Certification of Emergency)(Casal, Jose) |
| Filing 11 REPLY to Response to Motion re #6 MOTION to Expedite MOTION to Stay Pending Appeal Amended filed by Cadwalader, Wickerman & Taft LLP. (Casal, Jose) |
| Filing 10 REPLY to Response to Motion re #6 MOTION to Expedite MOTION to Stay Pending Appeal filed by Cadwalader, Wickerman & Taft LLP. (Casal, Jose) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to File Response Memorandum In Excess of Twenty Pages re #8 Response/Reply (Other), by Maria Yip. (Gassenheimer, James) |
| Filing 8 Plaintiff's RESPONSE to #6 MOTION to Expedite MOTION to Stay Pending Appeal by Maria Yip. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P, #17 Exhibit Q)(Gassenheimer, James) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER Requiring Response as to #6 MOTION to Expedite MOTION to Stay Pending Appeal. (Responses to motion due by 10/24/2018). Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 10/23/2018. See attached document for full details. (jas)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Expedite , MOTION to Stay Pending Appeal ( Responses due by 11/2/2018) by Cadwalader, Wickerman & Taft LLP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Motion for Stay Pending Appeal, #2 Exhibit B to Motion for Stay Pending Appeal, #3 Exhibit C to Motion for Stay Pending Appeal, #4 Exhibit D to Motion for Stay Pending Appeal, #5 Exhibit E to Motion for Stay Pending Appeal, #6 Exhibit F to Motion for Stay Pending Appeal, #7 Exhibit G to Motion for Stay Pending Appeal)(Casal, Jose) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER Requiring Response to #1 Motion for Leave to Appeal Order Denying Motion to Compel Arbitration, Maria Yip and any other affected party response due 10/30/2018. Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 10/18/2018. See attached document for full details. (jas)
|
| Filing 4 Clerk's Notice to Parties Re Administrative Order 2015-9 and Amendments to Federal Bankruptcy Rules and Local Rule 87.4 Re Processing of Bankruptcy Appeals (jc) |
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Ursula Ungaro. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jc) |
| Filing 2 Bankruptcy Transmittal of re #1 Bankruptcy Motion (Complaint) for Leave to File Appeal of Bankruptcy Order filed by Cadwalader, Wickerman & Taft LLP (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet)(lle) |
| Filing 1 MOTION (COMPLAINT) for Leave to File Appeal of Bankruptcy Order Bankruptcy Court case number 18-01289-AJC. filed by Cadwalader, Wickerman & Taft LLP. (Attachments: #1 NOTICE OF APPEAL)(lle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
