Universa Investments L.P. v. Borodich et al
| Universa Investments L.P. |
| Alexander Borodich and Universa Corporation Ltd. |
| 1:2018cv24286 |
| October 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed for Service Abroad by Universa Investments L.P.. Universa Corporation Ltd. served on 11/23/2018, answer due 12/14/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "A", #2 Exhibit "B", #3 Exhibit "C")(de Alejo, Alexandra) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed for Service Abroad by Universa Investments L.P.. Alexander Borodich served on 11/23/2018, answer due 12/14/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "A", #2 Exhibit "B", #3 Exhibit "C")(de Alejo, Alexandra) |
Filing 9
ENDORSED ORDER granting #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. Joseph V. Mauch is permitted to appear before this Court on behalf of Plaintiff Universa Investments L.P., for all purposes relating to this action. The clerk is directed to provide Notice of Electronic Filings to Mr. Mauch at JMauch@sflaw.com. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 10/26/2018. (isc)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Joseph V. Mauch. Filing Fee $ 75.00 Receipt # 113C-11107883 by Universa Investments L.P.. Responses due by 11/8/2018 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(de Alejo, Alexandra) |
| Filing 7 Certificate of Interested Parties/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Universa Investments L.P. (de Alejo, Alexandra) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 10/18/2018. (isc) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Universa Corporation Ltd. (ls) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Alexander Borodich. (ls) |
| Filing 3 FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK (ls) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (ls) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ALEXANDER BORODICH, UNIVERSA CORPORATION LTD. Filing fees $ 400.00. Pay.gov Agency Tracking ID 113C-11083420, payment transferred from : 18-cv-24286 UNIVERSA INVESTMENTS L.P vs. BORODICH, et al., filed by UNIVERSA INVESTMENTS L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s))(de Alejo, Alexandra) Modified text on 10/18/2018 (jua). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
