Rushton v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
| Turman Trent Rushton |
| Scottsdale Insurance Company |
| 1:2018cv24317 |
| October 18, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Ursula Ungaro |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 STATUS REPORT by Scottsdale Insurance Company (Seale, Nyasha) |
Filing 7
ORDER granting #4 Motion to Abate Litigation and Compel Appraisal. Closing Case. Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 11/7/2018. See attached document for full details. (ar2)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER SETTING INITIAL PLANNING AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, ( Joint Scheduling Report due by 11/21/2018, Scheduling Conference set for 12/7/2018 11:00 AM in Miami Division before Judge Ursula Ungaro.) Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 11/2/2018. See attached document for full details. (ra)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Scottsdale Insurance Company re #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), to Opposing Counsel (Seale, Nyasha) |
| Filing 4 Defendant's MOTION to Stay or Abate Litigation and Compel Appraisal by Scottsdale Insurance Company. Responses due by 11/2/2018 (Seale, Nyasha) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER that Defendant SHALL respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint no later than October 25, 2018. (Scottsdale Insurance Company response due 10/25/2018). Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 10/19/2018. See attached document for full details. (mc)
|
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Ursula Ungaro. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (mee) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Turman Trent Rushton vs. Scottsdale Insurance Company) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11088546, filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A_Plaintiff's estimate, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit State Court Records)(Seale, Nyasha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rushton v. Scottsdale Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Scottsdale Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Nyasha Simone Seale |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Turman Trent Rushton | |
| Represented By: | Jasiel Tabares |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
