MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS, SERIES LLC,et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation et al
| MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC, SERIES PMPI and MSPA Claims 1, LLC |
| Stryker Corporation of Michigan, HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP. and Stryker Corporation |
| 1:2018cv24449 |
| October 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Ursula Ungaro |
| Contract: Recovery Medicare |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Joint RESPONSE to #8 Order Staying Case by MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC, MSPA Claims 1, LLC, SERIES PMPI. (Ruiz, John) |
| Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT. Case transferred from Florida Southern has been opened in District of Massachusetts as case 1:18-cv-12343, filed 11/08/2018. (bb) |
| Filing 9 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-36) transferring case to the District of Massachusetts re: MDL 2768 for consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 USC 1407 and assigned to the Honorable Indira Talwani. (Signed by Jeffery N. Luthi, Clerk of the Panel). (mc) |
| SYSTEM ENTRY - Case 1:18-cv-24449 electronically transferred out to Massachusetts. (mc) |
Filing 8
ORDER STAYING CASE. Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 10/31/2018. See attached document for full details. (lbc)
|
| Filing 7 Courtesy Copy of Twentieth Notice of Potential Tag-Along Actions (Attachments: #1 Schedule of Actions, #2 Proof of Service)(mc) |
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer by HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP., Stryker Corporation, Stryker Corporation of Michigan. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(McLoone, Jennifer) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER that Defendants SHALL respond to the Complaint no later than November 1. 2018. (HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP. response due 11/1/2018; Stryker Corporation response due 11/1/2018; Stryker Corporation of Michigan response due 11/1/2018). Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 10/26/2018. See attached document for full details. (mc)
|
| Filing 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Party(ies) Improperly Formatted. The Filer failed to enter the party name(s) in accordance with the CM/ECF Format for Adding Parties for Attorneys Guide. The correction was made. It is not necessary to re-file the document. (cds) |
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Incorrect case opening information. The Filer selected the incorrect Cause of Action when filing. The correction was made. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (cds) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Ursula Ungaro. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (cds) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint For Pure Bill Of Discovery) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11107084, filed by Stryker Corporation, Stryker Corporation of Michigan, Howmedica Osteonics Corporation d/b/a Stryker Orthopedics. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2)(McLoone, Jennifer) Text Modified on 10/26/2018 (cds).No Answer/Motion To Dismiss Filed. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
