Bosli v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Lamia Bosli |
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company |
1:2018cv24679 |
November 7, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Jose E Martinez |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Certificate of Interested Parties by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Metlife, Inc. for Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (Jacobson, Jeannine) |
Filing 8 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. (Jacobson, Jeannine) |
Filing 7 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #6 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before January 8, 2019. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 12/21/2018. (ean) |
Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Attorney Jeannine Cline Jacobson added to party Metropolitan Life Insurance Company(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Jacobson, Jeannine) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline by Lamia Bosli. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company served on 12/3/2018, answer due 12/26/2018. (Alters, Rachel) |
Filing 4 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/8/2018. See attached document for full details. (dq) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. (cds) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11142838, filed by Lamia Bosli, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Alters, Rachel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bosli v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lamia Bosli | |
Represented By: | Rachel Alters |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Jeannine Cline Jacobson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.