BYRD v. MIAMI DADE COUNTY
| ANTONIO BYRD |
| MIAMI DADE COUNTY |
| 1:2018cv24744 |
| November 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Marcia G Cooke |
| Jonathan Goodman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0451 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
PAPERLESS ORDER denying #8 Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Special Process Server. Additionally, #6 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs is denied due to Plaintiff's wages, cash savings, and referenced assets. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 12/19/2018. (km03)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE by ANTONIO BYRD re #8 MOTION for Appointment of Special Process Server (Davis, Dameka) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Appointment of Special Process Server by ANTONIO BYRD. Responses due by 12/28/2018 (Davis, Dameka) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER OF REFERRAL AND ORDER REGARDING COURT PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 11/20/2018. See attached document for full details. (smz)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE by ANTONIO BYRD re 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case (Davis, Dameka) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by ANTONIO BYRD re 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case (Davis, Dameka) |
| Filing 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Filing fees not paid. Filer is instructed to file a Notice of Compliance of Filing Fee, and electronically pay the correct fees of $400.00 within 24 hours of this notice. (drz) |
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. No Civil Cover Sheet. Filer is instructed to file a Notice (Other) with the Civil Cover Sheet attached within 24 hours of the notice. (drz) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Marcia G. Cooke. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (drz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MIAMI DADE COUNTY. Filing fees $ 400.00. IFP Filed, filed by ANTONIO BYRD.(Davis, Dameka) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BYRD v. MIAMI DADE COUNTY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MIAMI DADE COUNTY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ANTONIO BYRD | |
| Represented By: | Dameka Lachelle Davis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
