GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company v. Herrera et al
Plaintiff: GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant: Julio Herrera and Brianna Pucko
Case Number: 1:2018cv25204
Filed: December 12, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Edwin G Torres
Referring Judge: Kathleen M Williams
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 15, 2019 Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline by GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company. Brianna Pucko served on 12/18/2018, answer due 1/8/2019. (Quintana,, Juan)
January 15, 2019 Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline by GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company. Julio Herrera served on 12/18/2018, answer due 1/8/2019. (Quintana,, Juan)
December 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF REFERRAL TO Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres for Discovery Matters AND NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 12/18/2018. See attached document for full details. (drz)
December 12, 2018 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Julio Herrera, Brianna Pucko. (mc)
December 12, 2018 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (mc)
December 12, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT PETITION TO COMPEL APPOINTMENT OF A NEUTRAL UMPIRE against Julio Herrera, Brianna Pucko. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11234119, filed by GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) Julio Herrera, #3 Summon(s) Brianna Pucko, #4 Exhibit A, #5 Exhibit B, #6 Exhibit C, #7 Exhibit D)(Quintana,, Juan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company v. Herrera et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company
Represented By: Juan Carlos Quintana,, Jr.
Represented By: Andrew Edward Grigsby, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Julio Herrera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brianna Pucko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?