Henry v. Fernandez-Rundle
Shawn Marcos Henry |
Katherine Fernandez-Rundle |
1:2018cv25256 |
December 14, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Ursula Ungaro |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Acknowledgment of Receipt of NOA from USCA for the Federal Circuit re #6 Notice of Appeal, filed by Shawn Marcos Henry. Date received by USCA for the Federal Circuit: 1/9/19. USCA for the Federal Circuit Case Number: 19-1391. (hh) |
Transmission of Notice of Appeal, Order under appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit re #6 Notice of Appeal, Notice has been electronically mailed. (apz) |
Filing 7 USCA Appeal Fees received $ 505.00 receipt number 178878 re #6 Notice of Appeal, filed by Shawn Marcos Henry. (apz) |
Filing 6 Notice of Appeal as to #5 Order Dismissing Case as Frivolous by Shawn Marcos Henry. Filing fee $ 505.00 Receipt#: 178878. Within fourteen days of the filing date of a Notice of Appeal, the appellant must complete the Federal Circuit Transcript Order Form regardless of whether transcripts are being ordered [Pursuant to FRAP 10(b)]. For information go to our FLSD website under Transcript Information. (apz) Text Modified on 1/4/2019 (apz). |
Filing 5 ORDER DISMISSING CASE AS FRIVOLOUS Closing Case. Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 12/18/2018. See attached document for full details. (pcs) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Katherine Fernandez-Rundle. (pes) (Main Document 4 replaced due to missing pages on 1/2/2019) (nc). Modified docket text on 1/2/2019 (nc). |
Filing 3 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 12/14/2018 in the amount of $ 400.00, receipt number FLS100177989. (vt) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Ursula Ungaro. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (pes) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Katherine Fernandez-Rundle. Filing fees $ 400.00, filed by Shawn Marcos Henry. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(pes) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Henry v. Fernandez-Rundle | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Shawn Marcos Henry | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Katherine Fernandez-Rundle | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.