Gomez v. Beal Bank USA
| Andres Gomez |
| Beal Bank USA |
| 1:2019cv20112 |
| January 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ENDORSED ORDER administratively closing case in light of #11 Joint Notice of Settlement, which indicates that this matter has settled in full. The parties are hereby notified that, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, they must file a Stipulation or Notice of Dismissal and/or Settlement Agreement along with any other pertinent document necessary to conclude this action. Any pending motions are denied as moot. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (lfn)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Settlement Joint Notice of Settlement by Andres Gomez (Perez, Anthony) |
|
Filing 10
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #9 Defendant Beal Bank's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Defendant's Response shall be filed on or before March 1, 2019. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (lfn)
|
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Beal Bank USA. (Kaufman, Dora) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Compliance Defendant, Beal Bank USA's Report and Notice of Compliance with January 9, 2019 Endorsed Order by Beal Bank USA re 5 Notice of Court Practice,,,, (Kaufman, Dora) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Dora Faye Kaufman on behalf of Beal Bank USA. Attorney Dora Faye Kaufman added to party Beal Bank USA(pty:dft). (Kaufman, Dora) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline by Andres Gomez. Beal Bank USA served on 1/10/2019, answer due 1/31/2019. (Perez, Anthony) |
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. The Complaint in this action is filed under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. 12181 et seq. In order to assist the Court in the management of this case, and in an effort to foster early and cost-effective resolution, the parties are ORDERED as follows: Within fourteen (14) days of service of the Complaint, Defendant shall file a report with the Court indicating whether it intends to remediate the deficiencies identified in the Complaint and agrees to pay reasonable attorneys fees in connection with this action, as determined by the Court or agreement of the parties. If so, Defendant shall include a timeline for remediation. If, upon review of the report, the Court finds that Defendant intends to remediate the property in a timely manner, the Court will administratively close the case pending remediation. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (lfn)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (lfn) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Beal Bank USA. (kpe) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (kpe) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Beal Bank USA. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11296089, filed by Andres Gomez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Perez, Anthony) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gomez v. Beal Bank USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Andres Gomez | |
| Represented By: | Anthony Joseph Perez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Beal Bank USA | |
| Represented By: | Dora Faye Kaufman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
