Yepez v. Beverage Solutions, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Jose Yepez
Defendant: Beverage Solutions, Inc. and Mark Schwartz
Case Number: 1:2019cv20115
Filed: January 9, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Ursula Ungaro
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 0201
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Motion for Settlement; granting #11 Motion to Dismiss. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement until April 19, 2019. Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 02/19/2019. See attached document for full details. (jao)
February 15, 2019 Filing 11 Joint MOTION for Settlement Approval ( Responses due by 3/1/2019), Joint MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal with Prejudice #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), by Jose Yepez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Georges-Pierre, Anthony)
February 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER denying #9 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Jose Yepez. The Parties SHALL re-file a Motion for Approval of FLSA Settlement in order to correct the deficiencies within this Order no later than Friday, February 15, 2019. Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 02/8/2019. See attached document for full details. (jao)
February 4, 2019 Filing 9 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by Jose Yepez (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Georges-Pierre, Anthony)
January 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Order. The Clerk of Court SHALL administratively close this case. All future hearings are CANCELLED and all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. Closing Case. Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 1/17/2019. See attached document for full details. (amb)
January 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER. THE PARTIES are hereby notified that all papers related to the settlement reached by the parties, including any order of dismissal stating specific terms and conditions, must be received by this Court by February 16, 2019. Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 1/17/2019. See attached document for full details. (amb)
January 16, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Settlement by Jose Yepez (Horowitz, Max)
January 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER SETTING INITIAL PLANNING AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, ( Joint Scheduling Report due by 2/8/2019, Scheduling Conference set for 2/22/2019 11:00 AM in Miami Division before Judge Ursula Ungaro.) Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 1/15/2019. See attached document for full details. (ra)
January 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER AND REFERRAL IN ACTIONS BROUGHT UNDER THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Ch. Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan for Settlement. Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 1/15/2019. See attached document for full details. (ra)
January 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER re #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), filed by Beverage Solutions, Inc., Mark Schwartz; Beverage Solutions, Inc. response due 1/16/2019; Mark Schwartz response due 1/16/2019. Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 1/9/2019. See attached document for full details. (jao)
January 9, 2019 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Ursula Ungaro. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jao)
January 9, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - 11th Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida) Filing fee $400.00. Pay.gov Agency Tracking ID 113C-11296118, payment transferred from : 19CV20113, filed by Mark Schwartz, Beverage Solutions, Inc.. No Answer and/or Motion to Dismiss Filed. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1-Complaint-Summons-return of service, #3 Exhibit 2-notice of removal - state court)(Blonsky, Daniel) Modified on 1/9/2019 (jao).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Yepez v. Beverage Solutions, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Beverage Solutions, Inc.
Represented By: Daniel Frederick Blonsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Schwartz
Represented By: Daniel Frederick Blonsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jose Yepez
Represented By: Anthony Maximillien Georges-Pierre
Represented By: Max Lloyd Horowitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?