WHITEHEAD v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: SHEILA MCCATTY WHITEHEAD
Defendant: Nancy A Berryhill
Case Number: 1:2019cv20174
Filed: January 11, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: John J O'Sullivan
Referring Judge: Ursula Ungaro
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 7, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Stephanie I. R. Fidler on behalf of Nancy A Berryhill. Attorney Stephanie I. R. Fidler added to party Nancy A Berryhill(pty:dft). (Fidler, Stephanie)
February 19, 2019 Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed Commissioner of Social Security, c/o United States Attorney's Office served on 2/14/2019, answer due 4/15/2019. (drz)
January 30, 2019 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Nancy A Berryhill. (dj)
January 29, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) - Proposed summons - Attorney General of the United States by SHEILA MCCATTY WHITEHEAD (Attachments: #1 Proposed summons - U.S. Attorney's office, #2 Proposed summons - Office of the General Counsel) (Bohr, Sarah)
January 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. USM Service Ordered and Summonses NOT provided for USM Service. Signed by Ch. Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan on 1/15/2019. See attached document for full details. (tro)
January 14, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by SHEILA MCCATTY WHITEHEAD. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Indigency)(Bohr, Sarah)
January 11, 2019 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Ursula Ungaro and Ch. Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pursuant to the Clerks directive of this cause, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (drz)
January 11, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SHEILA MCCATTY WHITEHEAD. Filing fees $ 400.00. NO IFP Filed, filed by SHEILA MCCATTY WHITEHEAD. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bohr, Sarah) Modified title text on 1/14/2019 (asl).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WHITEHEAD v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SHEILA MCCATTY WHITEHEAD
Represented By: Sarah Harriet Bohr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A Berryhill
Represented By: Stephanie I. R. Fidler
Represented By: Noticing Social Security US Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?