Gady Abramson, D.C. P.A. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Gady Abramson, D.C. P.A. and Gady Abramson, D.C. P.A. doing business as Back to Mind other Shantelicia Rhodes |
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company |
1:2019cv20182 |
January 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Federico A Moreno |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Final Order of Dismissal and Order Denying All Pending Motions as Moot. Closing Case. Motions terminated: #8 MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM MOTION to Strike #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), demand for equitable relief filed by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 1/31/2019. See attached document for full details. (ap00) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Gady Abramson, D.C. P.A. (Peterson, Ryan) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Starr Linette Brookins on behalf of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. Attorney Starr Linette Brookins added to party Liberty Mutual Insurance Company(pty:dft). (Brookins, Starr) |
Filing 9 Notice of Court Practice in Removal Cases. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 1/16/2019 for Judge Federico Moreno. See attached document for full details. (ap00) |
Filing 8 MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , MOTION to Strike #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), demand for equitable relief by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. Responses due by 1/31/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Insurance Policy)(Lavisky, Matthew) |
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Group Inc., Corporate Parent LMHC Massachusetts Holdings Inc., Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Holding Company Inc. for Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Lavisky, Matthew) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal OF COUNT I by Gady Abramson, D.C. P.A. (Peterson, Ryan) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Ryan Allen Peterson on behalf of Gady Abramson, D.C. P.A.. Attorney Ryan Allen Peterson added to party Gady Abramson, D.C. P.A. (pty:pla). (Peterson, Ryan) |
Filing 4 Notice of Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Lavisky, Matthew) |
Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE that attorney Richard Patino has not been added to this case re #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint),. For further information, please contact Attorney Admissions at 305-523-5265. (pt) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Federico A. Moreno. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (kpe) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - County Court of Miami Dade County) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11308899, filed by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. No Answer/Motion to Dismiss Filed. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-1 - Complaint, #3 Exhibit A-2 - Remaining State Court Documents, #4 Docket Sheet)(Lavisky, Matthew) Modified on 1/14/2019 (kpe). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.