Eley v. Carnival Corporation
Silinda Eley |
Carnival Corporation and Carnival Corporation a Panamanian Corporation doing business as Carnival Cruise Lines |
1:2019cv20192 |
January 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Darrin P Gayles |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by Silinda Eley (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Gerson, Nicholas) |
Filing 8 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Silinda Eley (Markel, David) |
Filing 7 ENDORSED ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER. Pursuant to S.D. Fla. Local Rule 16.1, on or before February 25, 2019, the parties shall prepare and file a Joint Scheduling Report, as well as Certificates of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statements.The parties shall also file a Proposed Scheduling Order, adhering to the format and guidance of the attached form. If the parties deviate in any way from that format and guidance, they shall contemporaneously submit a written explanation, which provides their purported justification for each and every deviation. If the parties fail to submit such written explanation, the Court may enter a Scheduling Order that does not take into account the parties' proposed dates.Failure to comply with this Order shall be grounds for dismissal without prejudice and without further notice. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles See attached document for full details. (lfn) |
Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Parties/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Carnival Corporation (Magee, John) |
Filing 5 Defendant's ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Carnival Corporation. Attorney John Michael Magee added to party Carnival Corporation(pty:dft). (Magee, John) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (lfn) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Carnival Corporation. (kpe) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (kpe) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against Carnival Corporation, a Panamanian Corporation. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11310325, filed by Silinda Eley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summon(s))(Gerson, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.