Gomez v. CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
| Andres Gomez |
| CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
| 1:2019cv20319 |
| January 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Ursula Ungaro |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 3/19/2019. See attached document for full details. (cds)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice by Andres Gomez (Perez, Anthony) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER Administratively Closing Case. Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 2/11/2019. See attached document for full details. (cds)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER, ( Settlement Agreement due by 3/11/2019.) Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 2/11/2019. See attached document for full details. (cds)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Settlement Joint Notice of Settlement by Andres Gomez (Perez, Anthony) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline by Andres Gomez. CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION served on 1/25/2019, answer due 2/15/2019. (Perez, Anthony) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER SETTING INITIAL PLANNING AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, ( Joint Scheduling Report due by 2/22/2019, Scheduling Conference set for 3/8/2019 09:30 AM in Miami Division before Judge Ursula Ungaro.) Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 1/28/2019. See attached document for full details. (ra)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION. (cds) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Ursula Ungaro. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11334603, filed by Andres Gomez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Perez, Anthony) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gomez v. CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Andres Gomez | |
| Represented By: | Anthony Joseph Perez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
