Townsend v. Social Security Administation
| Glen Townsend |
| Social Security Administation |
| 1:2019cv20347 |
| January 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jose E Martinez |
| Alicia M Otazo-Reyes |
| Contract: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0206 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Glen Townsend. (mee) |
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER VACATING #4 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report. This Order was entered in error. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 2/25/2019. (ean)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER denying #5 MOTION to Submit Document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes on 2/21/2019. See attached document for full details. (jsa)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Submit Document by Glen Townsend. (mee) |
|
Filing 4
Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 1/28/2019. See attached document for full details. (dq)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes For All Pre-Trial, Non-Dispositive Matters, And For Report And Recommendation On All Dispositive Matters. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 1/28/2019. See attached document for full details. (cds)
|
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez and Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pursuant to the Clerks directive of this cause, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ail) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administation. Filing fees $ 400.00 Receipt#: NOT PAID/DUE, filed by Glen Townsend.(ail) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/25/2019: #1 Exhibit) (ail). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Townsend v. Social Security Administation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Social Security Administation | |
| Represented By: | Noticing Social Security US Attorney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Glen Townsend | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
