Gomez v. Pacific National Bank
| Andres Gomez |
| Pacific National Bank |
| 1:2019cv20362 |
| January 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Marcia G Cooke |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Pacific National Bank (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Exhibit)(Protopapadakis, Anastasia) |
Filing 9
ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE UPON NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 2/28/2019. See attached document for full details. (smz)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Settlement Joint Notice of Settlement by Andres Gomez (Perez, Anthony) |
|
Filing 7
ENDORSED ORDER Granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before March 22, 2019. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 2/5/2019. (smz)
|
| Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Parties/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Pacific National Bank (Protopapadakis, Anastasia) |
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Pacific National Bank. Attorney Anastasia Protopapadakis added to party Pacific National Bank(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Protopapadakis, Anastasia) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline by Andres Gomez. Pacific National Bank served on 1/30/2019, answer due 2/20/2019. (Perez, Anthony) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Pacific National Bank. (pcs) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Marcia G. Cooke. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (pcs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Pacific National Bank. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11345074, filed by Andres Gomez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Perez, Anthony) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gomez v. Pacific National Bank | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Andres Gomez | |
| Represented By: | Anthony Joseph Perez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Pacific National Bank | |
| Represented By: | Anastasia Protopapadakis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
