Naserzare v. Saks Fifth Avenue LLC et al
| Babak Naserzare |
| Saks & Company LLC, Saks Fifth Avenue LLC and Hudson's Bay Company |
| 1:2019cv20432 |
| February 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. § 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 23
PAPERLESS Order Dismissing Party Saks Fifth Avenue LLC pursuant to #21 Joint Stipulation of Dismissal without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (lfn)
|
|
Filing 22
PAPERLESS Order Dismissing Party Hudson's Bay Company pursuant to #21 Joint Stipulation of Dismissal Without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (lfn)
|
| Filing 21 STIPULATION of Dismissal Without Prejudice of Saks Fifth Avenue and Hudson's Bay Company by Hudson's Bay Company, Saks & Company LLC, Saks Fifth Avenue LLC (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Siegel, Steven) |
|
Filing 20
PAPERLESS ORDER denying as moot #8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim in light of #18 Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (lfn)
|
| Filing 19 Notice of Filing Amended Complaint by Babak Naserzare. (O'Connell, Kelly) -Modified text on 3/26/2019 (gp).- |
| Filing 18 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Hudson's Bay Company, Saks & Company LLC, Saks Fifth Avenue LLC, filed by Babak Naserzare.(O'Connell, Kelly) |
| Filing 17 Clerks Notice to Filer re #11 Summons Returned Executed, #12 Summons Returned Executed. Incorrect Service Date Entered; ERROR - The incorrect service date was entered. The correction was made by the Clerk and filing was re-docketed, see 15 Summons Returned Executed, 16 Summons Returned Executed. It is not necessary to refile this document. (kpe) |
| Filing 16 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Babak Naserzare. Saks Fifth Avenue LLC served on 2/8/2019, answer due 3/1/2019. See DE #12 for image. (kpe) |
| Filing 15 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Babak Naserzare. Saks & Company LLC served on 2/8/2019, answer due 3/1/2019. See DE #11 for image. (kpe) |
| Filing 14 Proposed SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f) by Hudson's Bay Company, Saks Fifth Avenue LLC (Siegel, Steven) |
| Filing 13 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f) by Hudson's Bay Company, Saks Fifth Avenue LLC (Siegel, Steven) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Babak Naserzare. Saks Fifth Avenue LLC served on 2/6/2019, answer due 2/27/2019. (O'Connell, Kelly) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Babak Naserzare. Saks & Company LLC served on 2/6/2019, answer due 2/27/2019. (O'Connell, Kelly) |
| Filing 10 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Saks & Company LLC, Saks Fifth Avenue LLC (Siegel, Steven) |
|
Filing 9
ENDORSED ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER. Pursuant to S.D. Fla. Local Rule 16.1, on or before March 22, 2019, the parties shall prepare and file a Joint Scheduling Report, as well as Certificates of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statements.The parties shall also file a Proposed Scheduling Order, adhering to the format and guidance of the attached form. If the parties deviate in any way from that format and guidance, they shall contemporaneously submit a written explanation, which provides their purported justification for each and every deviation. If the parties fail to submit such written explanation, the Court may enter a Scheduling Order that does not take into account the parties' proposed dates.Failure to comply with this Order shall be grounds for dismissal without prejudice and without further notice. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles See attached document for full details. (lfn)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Complaint, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Saks & Company LLC, Saks Fifth Avenue LLC. Responses due by 3/15/2019 (Siegel, Steven) |
| Filing 7 Certificate of Interested Parties/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Babak Naserzare identifying Other Affiliate caroline Miller for Babak Naserzare (O'Connell, Kelly) |
| Reset Deadlines Per DE#6. Miscellaneous Deadline 2/26/2019. (cqs) |
|
Filing 6
PAPERLESS ORDER directing Plaintiff Babak Naserzare to file a Certificate of Interested Parties (the "Certificate") as required by Local Rule 16.1. In a prior related action, Judge Altonaga twice ordered Plaintiff to submit the Certificate, but Plaintiff failed to do so. See Naserzare v. Saks Fifth Avenue, LLC, et al., No. 18-cv-24851 (S.D. Fla. Jan. 11, 2019) [ECF Nos. 12, 19]; see also [ECF No. 23 (dismissing case for failure to comply with the Court's Order)]. Plaintiff has similarly failed to file the Certificate here. Accordingly, on or before February 26, 2019, Plaintiff shall file a Certificate of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statement that contains a complete list of persons, associated persons, firms, partnerships, or corporations that have a financial interest in the outcome of this case, including subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporations, and other identifiable legal entities related to a party. Throughout the pendency of the action, Plaintiff is under a continuing obligation to amend, correct, and update the certificate. Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal with prejudice. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (lfn)
|
| Filing 5 Notice of Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by Saks & Company LLC, Saks Fifth Avenue LLC. Attorney Steven Adam Siegel added to party Saks & Company LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Steven Adam Siegel added to party Saks Fifth Avenue LLC(pty:dft). (Siegel, Steven) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (lfn) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Saks & Company LLC, Saks Fifth Avenue LLC. (kpe) (Main Document 3 replaced on 2/1/2019) (kpe). |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (kpe) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hudsons Bay Company, Saks & Company LLC, Saks Fifth Avenue LLC. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11361898, filed by Babak Naserzare. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Affidavit, #3 Affidavit)(O'Connell, Kelly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
