King Ocean Services Ltd. v. Falcon Distribution Company
King Ocean Services Ltd. |
Falcon Distribution Company |
1:2019cv20629 |
February 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Darrin P Gayles |
Contract: Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 PAPERLESS ORDER DISMISSING CASE. This case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to #14 Stipulation of Settlement and Dismissal. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' settlement agreement. Each party shall bear its own fees and costs. All pending motions are denied as moot. (isc) |
Filing 14 STIPULATION of Dismissal and of Settlement by King Ocean Services Ltd. (Dolvin, Dee) |
Filing 13 Joint MOTION for Settlement and of Dismissal ( Responses due by 4/18/2019), Joint MOTION to Retain Jurisdiction to Enforce Terms of Stipulation of Settlement by King Ocean Services Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Dolvin, Dee) |
Filing 12 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #11 Defendant Falcon Distribution Company's Renewed Motion for Enlargement of Time to File its Response to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant shall respond to the Complaint on or before April 4, 2019. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 3/20/2019. (isc) |
Filing 11 Renewed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint, by Falcon Distribution Company. (Cueva, James) |
Filing 10 PAPERLESS ORDER denying #7 Defendant, Falcon Distribution Company's Motion for Enlargement of Time to File its Answer and Affirmative Defenses. Defendant has failed to fully comply with S.D. Fla. L.R. 7.1(a)(3). Counsel shall identify with specificity the reasonable efforts to confer (including the date, time, and manner of each effort). The Motion is denied without prejudice. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 3/19/2019. (isc) |
Filing 9 Clerks Notice of Docket Correction re 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Correction Other. (Entered In Error. Civil Cover Sheet is Exhibit #4 Of Complaint) (cds) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by James Adrian Cueva on behalf of Falcon Distribution Company (Cueva, James) |
Filing 7 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint, by Falcon Distribution Company. Attorney James Adrian Cueva added to party Falcon Distribution Company(pty:dft). (Cueva, James) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by King Ocean Services Ltd.. Falcon Distribution Company served on 2/25/2019, answer due 3/18/2019. (Dolvin, Dee) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 2/19/2019. (isc) |
Filing 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. No Civil Cover Sheet. Filer is instructed to file a Notice (Other) with the Civil Cover Sheet attached within 24 hours of the notice. (cds) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Falcon Distribution Company. (cds) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Falcon Distribution Company. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11401971, filed by King Ocean Services Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Invoices, #2 Exhibit B - Terms & Conditions, #3 Summon(s), #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dolvin, Dee) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: King Ocean Services Ltd. v. Falcon Distribution Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Falcon Distribution Company | |
Represented By: | James Adrian Cueva |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: King Ocean Services Ltd. | |
Represented By: | Dee Miller Dolvin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.