Apparisio v. Pruco Life Insurance Company
Olivier F Apparisio |
Pruco Life Insurance Company |
The Estate of Eve B. Defrance |
1:2019cv20823 |
March 1, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Robert N Scola |
Edwin G Torres |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint , THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT against The Estate of Eve B. Defrance, COUNTERCLAIM against Olivier F Apparisio by Pruco Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Coroner's Investigation Summary, #2 Exhibit B - Defrance Policy)(Arana, Enrique) |
Filing 10 PAPERLESS ORDER: The Court grants #8 the Defendant's unopposed motion for an extension of time to respond to the complaint. The Defendant must file its response on or before April 11, 2019. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. on 4/4/2019. (kbe) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Raina Shipman on behalf of Pruco Life Insurance Company. Attorney Raina Shipman added to party Pruco Life Insurance Company(pty:dft). (Shipman, Raina) |
Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Pruco Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Arana, Enrique) |
Filing 7 PAPERLESS ORDER: The Court grants #6 the parties' agreed motion for an extension of time for the Defendant to file a response to the complaint. The Defendant must file its response on or before April 4, 2019. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. on 3/22/2019. (kbe) |
Filing 6 Agreed MOTION for clarification #1 Complaint ( Responses due by 4/4/2019), Agreed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Pruco Life Insurance Company. Attorney Enrique Daniel Arana added to party Pruco Life Insurance Company(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Arana, Enrique) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Olivier F Apparisio. Pruco Life Insurance Company served on 3/6/2019, answer due 3/27/2019. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Corey, Michael) |
Filing 4 Order Requiring Discovery And Scheduling Conference And Order Referring Non-Dispositive Pretrial and Discovery Matters To Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 3/7/2019. See attached document for full details. (jas) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Pruco Life Insurance Company. (ebz) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ebz) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Pruco Life Insurance Company. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11439484, filed by Olivier F Apparisio. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Pruco Policy, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summon(s))(Corey, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.