Solano v. SAMSONITE COMPANY STORES, LLC
| William Solano |
| SAMSONITE COMPANY STORES, LLC |
| 1:2019cv21092 |
| March 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jose E Martinez |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER DENYING ALL PENDING MOTIONS AS MOOT. This case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 6/17/2019. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice by William Solano (Mendez, Diego) |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint, #6 Stipulation Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Initial Complaint Up to And Including June 14, 2019 by William Solano (Mendez, Diego) |
| Filing 6 STIPULATION re #5 Summons Returned Executed Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Initial Complaint Up to And Including May 16, 2019 by William Solano (Mendez, Diego) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by William Solano. SAMSONITE COMPANY STORES, LLC served on 3/26/2019, answer due 4/16/2019. (Mendez, Diego) |
|
Filing 4
Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 3/27/2019. See attached document for full details. (dq)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to SAMSONITE COMPANY STORES, LLC. (ar2) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ar2) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SAMSONITE COMPANY STORES, LLC. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11494195, filed by William Solano. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Expert Affidavit, #3 Exhibit Expert CV, #4 Summon(s) Proposed Summons)(Mendez, Diego) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Solano v. SAMSONITE COMPANY STORES, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SAMSONITE COMPANY STORES, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: William Solano | |
| Represented By: | Diego German Mendez |
| Represented By: | Lydia Cira Quesada |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
