Jimenez et al v. Department of Homeland Security et al
| Juan Machado, Jose Munoz, Ivan Jimenez, Miguel Vasquez and Guillermo Sencion |
| Department of Homeland Security and Department of State |
| 1:2019cv21546 |
| April 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. § 0552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 STATUS REPORT regarding Defending Agencies' Processing of Plaintiffs' FOIA Requests by Department of Homeland Security, Department of State (Raurell, Carlos) |
Filing 16
PAPERLESS ORDER denying #13 Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for ECF Access for Pro Hac Vice Counsel. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (lfn)
|
|
Filing 15
PAPERLESS Administrative Order Closing Case pursuant to the Court's 14 Order. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (lfn)
|
|
Filing 14
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #12 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for 30-day Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint. In light of Defendant's representations in the Motion, this case shall be administratively closed. The parties shall file a status report on or before July 3, 2019, advising the Court as to Defendant's progress in providing Plaintiffs with the requested documents. The parties shall continue to file status reports with the Court every sixty (60) days thereafter. Either party may move to reopen when warranted. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (lfn)
|
| Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION for ECF Access for Pro Hac Vice Counsel by Ivan Jimenez, Juan Machado, Jose Munoz, Guillermo Sencion, Miguel Vasquez. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Knopf, Andrew) |
| Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint, by Department of Homeland Security, Department of State. Attorney Carlos Javier Raurell added to party Department of Homeland Security(pty:dft), Attorney Carlos Javier Raurell added to party Department of State(pty:dft). (Raurell, Carlos) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by Guillermo Sencion, Ivan Jimenez, Jose Munoz, Juan Machado, Miguel Vasquez. Department of Homeland Security served on 5/3/2019, answer due 7/2/2019; Department of State served on 5/3/2019, answer due 7/2/2019. (Knopf, Andrew) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Striking #9 Acknowledgment of Service filed by Jose Munoz, Guillermo Sencion, Ivan Jimenez, Miguel Vasquez, Juan Machado by Ivan Jimenez, Juan Machado, Jose Munoz, Guillermo Sencion, Miguel Vasquez (Knopf, Andrew) |
| Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE as to #1 Complaint, filed by Ivan Jimenez, Juan Machado, Jose Munoz, Guillermo Sencion, Miguel Vasquez. (Knopf, Andrew) |
|
Filing 8
ENDORSED ORDER granting #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. Kelly McClanahan is permitted to appear before this Court on behalf of Plaintiffs for all purposes relating to this action. The clerk is directed to provide Notice of Electronic Filings to Mr. McClanahan at Kel@NationalSecurityLaw.org. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (isc)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for KellyMcClanahan. Filing Fee $ 75.00 Receipt # 113C-11590697 by Ivan Jimenez, Juan Machado, Jose Munoz, Guillermo Sencion, Miguel Vasquez. Responses due by 5/10/2019 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order on Motion for PHV)(Knopf, Andrew) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Department of Homeland Security (pcs) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (isc) |
| Filing 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) cannot be issued. Summons NOT issued for the following reason - Incomplete Address for Department of Homeland Security. (pcs) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Department of State, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (pcs) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (pcs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11580435, filed by Guillermo Sencion, Ivan Jimenez, Jose Munoz, Juan Machado, Miguel Vasquez. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s) DHS, #2 Summon(s) DOS, #3 Summon(s) AG, #4 Summon(s) USA-SDFL, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Knopf, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
