Solano v. H & M Hennes & Mauritz Management B.V. LLC
| William Solano |
| H & M Hennes & Mauritz Management B.V. LLC |
| 1:2019cv21622 |
| April 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Beth Bloom |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER on Default Procedures. H & M Hennes & Mauritz Management B.V. LLC response due 7/3/2019. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 6/26/2019. See attached document for full details. (ls)
|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by William Solano. H & M Hennes & Mauritz Management B.V. LLC served on 6/3/2019, answer due 6/24/2019. (Mendez, Diego) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO FILE PROOF OF SERVICE. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 5/29/2019. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
|
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Counsel re #4 Order, Set/Reset Deadlines PLAINTIFF COUNSELS VERIFIED CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL REGARDING PRIOR FILINGS UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT by Diego German Mendez on behalf of William Solano (Mendez, Diego) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING VERIFIED CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL, SCHEDULING REPORT, AND CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES, ( Responses due by 5/3/2019). Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 4/26/2019. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to H & M Hennes & Mauritz Management B.V. LLC. (kpe) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Beth Bloom. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (kpe) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against H & M HENNES & MAURITZ MANAGEMENT. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11592008, filed by William Solano. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Expert Affidavit, #3 Exhibit Expert CV, #4 Summon(s) Proposed Summons)(Mendez, Diego) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Solano v. H & M Hennes & Mauritz Management B.V. LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: H & M Hennes & Mauritz Management B.V. LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: William Solano | |
| Represented By: | Diego German Mendez |
| Represented By: | Lydia Cira Quesada |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
