Chatfield et al v. American Security Group A-1, Inc et al
Antonio Chatfield and Lorenzo Patterson |
American Security Group A-1, Inc., Michael Nettles and A- |
1:2019cv21641 |
April 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Marcia G Cooke |
Jonathan Goodman |
Labor: Fair Standards |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 MOTION to Compel PLAINTIFFS COMPLIANCE WITH COURT ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT THEREOF filed by Antonio Chatfield, Lorenzo Patterson. Replies due by 7/1/2019. (Minick, Jonathan) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Compliance by Antonio Chatfield, Lorenzo Patterson re #3 Notice of Court Practice/to Appear/Other,, Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge, (Minick, Jonathan) |
Filing 9 Statement of: Claim by Antonio Chatfield, Lorenzo Patterson re #3 Notice of Court Practice/to Appear/Other,, Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge, (Minick, Jonathan) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Compel PLAINTIFFS COMPLIANCE WITH COURT ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT THEREOF by American Security Group A-1, Inc., Michael Nettles. Responses due by 7/3/2019 (Siminovsky, Alaina) |
Filing 7 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), filed by American Security Group A-1, Inc., Michael Nettles. (Siminovsky, Alaina) |
Filing 6 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), filed by Antonio Chatfield, Lorenzo Patterson. Replies due by 5/13/2019. (Minick, Jonathan) |
Filing 5 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), by American Security Group A-1, Inc., Michael Nettles. Responses due by 5/15/2019 (Siminovsky, Alaina) |
Filing 4 REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman per DE 3. (vjk) Modified docket text on 4/30/2019 (vjk). |
Filing 3 ORDER OF REFERRAL AND ORDER REGARDING COURT PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES. Referring Case to Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman for Pretrial Non-Dispositive Matters; Notice re Joint Motions. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 4/29/2019. See attached document for full details. (kou) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Marcia G. Cooke. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (amb) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Collective Action Complaint) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11593836, filed by Michael Nettles, American Security Group A-1, Inc d/b/a Lock and Key. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Siminovsky, Alaina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.