Padilla v. Comprehensive Health Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Annette Padilla
Defendant: Comprehensive Health Services, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2019cv21770
Filed: May 3, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Darrin P Gayles
Referring Judge: Alicia M Otazo-Reyes
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SCHEDULING ORDER: ( Jury Trial set for 6/22/2020 in Miami Division before Judge Darrin P. Gayles., Calendar Call set for 6/17/2020 09:30 AM in Miami Division before Judge Darrin P. Gayles., Status Conference set for 2/26/2020 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Judge Darrin P. Gayles., Amended Pleadings due by 7/26/2019., Expert Discovery due by 1/31/2020., Fact Discovery due by 1/31/2020., Joinder of Parties due by 7/26/2019., Dispositive Motions due by 2/28/2020., In Limine Motions due by 4/17/2020., Motions due by 4/17/2020., Joint Pretrial Stipulation due by 5/22/2020.), ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. ( Mediation Deadline 2/14/2020.), ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes for Discovery Matters. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 6/21/2019. See attached document for full details. (lk) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
June 20, 2019 Filing 7 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Annette Padilla (Saavedra, Nathaly)
June 20, 2019 Filing 6 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by Annette Padilla (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Saavedra, Nathaly)
May 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ENDORSED ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER. Pursuant to S.D. Fla. Local Rule 16.1, on or before June 20, 2019, the parties shall prepare and file a Joint Scheduling Report, as well as Certificates of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statements.The parties shall also file a Proposed Scheduling Order, adhering to the format and guidance of the attached form. If the parties deviate in any way from that format and guidance, they shall contemporaneously submit a written explanation, which provides their purported justification for each and every deviation. If the parties fail to submit such written explanation, the Court may enter a Scheduling Order that does not take into account the parties' proposed dates.Failure to comply with this Order shall be grounds for dismissal without prejudice and without further notice. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles See attached document for full details. (isc)
May 10, 2019 Filing 4 Defendant's ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint re the Notice of Removal with Jury Demand by Comprehensive Health Services, Inc.. (Rodriguez, Elizabeth)
May 3, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (isc)
May 3, 2019 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ar2)
May 3, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11612914, filed by Comprehensive Health Services, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Rodriguez, Elizabeth) Modified text on 5/3/2019 (ar2). (No answer/motion to dismiss filed).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Padilla v. Comprehensive Health Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Comprehensive Health Services, Inc.
Represented By: Elizabeth Mercedes Rodriguez
Represented By: Louis Donlan Wilson
Represented By: Fabian A. Ruiz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Annette Padilla
Represented By: Peter Michael Hoogerwoerd
Represented By: Carlos D. Serrano
Represented By: Nathaly Saavedra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?