Nunez v. Konica Minolta Business Solutions U.S.A., Inc.
| Hector Nunez |
| Konica Minolta Business Solutions U.S.A., Inc. |
| 1:2019cv21804 |
| May 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Robert N Scola |
| Edwin G Torres |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 0201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Compliance by Hector Nunez re #4 Order,, Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge, (Fakhoury, James) |
Filing 11
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Answer to #1 Complaint, for good cause shown in the unopposed motion:Defendant's Response/Answer now due 7/8/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 6/25/2019. (EGT)
|
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Konica Minolta Business Solutions U.S.A., Inc.. Attorney Cathy Mattson Stutin added to party Konica Minolta Business Solutions U.S.A., Inc.(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Stutin, Cathy) |
| Filing 9 Statement of: Claim by Hector Nunez re #4 Order,, Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge, (Fakhoury, James) |
|
Filing 8
PAPERLESS ORDER: The Court denies, without prejudice, #7 the Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to file his statement of claim because the motion does not contain a pre-filing-conference certification, as required by the Court's Local Rules. Local Rule 7.1(a)(3) requires an attorney filing a motion in a civil case to first confer with all parties or non-parties who may be affected by the relief sought in a good-faith effort to resolve by agreement the issues raised in the motion. The filing attorney must then include in the motion a statement explaining to the Court that (1) all or some of the issues raised in the motion are unopposed; (2) counsel conferred but could not agree on all or some of the issues raised in the motion; or (3) counsel diligently attempted to confer but was unable to reach the opposing counsel. S.D. Fla. L.R. 7.1(a)(3). "The purpose of the rule is to ensure judicial economy and prevent courts from considering issues the parties could agree on independently, and to ascertain whether the Court need wait for a response from the opposing party before deciding the motion." Aguilar v. United Floor Crew, Inc. , No. 14-CIV-61605, 2014 WL 6751663, at *1 (S.D. Fla. Dec. 1, 2014) (Bloom, J.). Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. on 6/17/2019. (kbe)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to comply with Order re #4 Order,, Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge, by Hector Nunez. Responses due by 6/26/2019 (Fakhoury, James) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by James E. Fakhoury on behalf of Hector Nunez. Attorney James E. Fakhoury added to party Hector Nunez(pty:pla). (Fakhoury, James) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER SETTING DISCOVERY PROCEDURES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 6/4/2019. See attached document for full details. (mdc)
|
|
Filing 4
Order Requiring Discovery And Scheduling Conference, Order Requiring Statement Of Claim And Response In FLSA Case, And Order Referring Non-Dispositive PretrialAnd Discovery Matters To The Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 5/22/2019. See attached document for full details. (drz)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Konica Minolta Business Solutions U.S.A., Inc. (drz) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (drz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Konica Minolta Business Solutions U.S.A., Inc.. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11616931, filed by Hector Nunez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Lineberry, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nunez v. Konica Minolta Business Solutions U.S.A., Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Konica Minolta Business Solutions U.S.A., Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Cathy Mattson Stutin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Hector Nunez | |
| Represented By: | Gregory Wayne Lineberry |
| Represented By: | William J Cantrell |
| Represented By: | James E. Fakhoury |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
