Gottlieb et al v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company
| Georgia Miles Gottlieb and Karen Star Gottlieb |
| USAA Casualty Insurance Company |
| 1:2019cv21859 |
| May 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #5 Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Stay Litigation Pending Completion of Appraisal and for an Itemized Appraisal Award. This case shall be stayed pending completion of appraisal. The appraiser shall (1) delineate, in writing, the scope of the appraisal as to the claim which is the subject of this lawsuit and specify which areas of the property and which coverages under the subject policy are to be appraised, (2) itemize the appraisal award as to the subject loss in detail, and (3) specify, in accordance with the terms of the subject policy, that any award is made without consideration of prior payments, the deductible amount, or any terms, conditions, provisions, or exclusions of the insurance policy. This case shall be closed for administrative purposes. Either party may move to reopen when warranted. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (isc)
|
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION to Stay Litigation Pending Completion of Appraisal and for an Itemized Appraisal Award by USAA Casualty Insurance Company. Responses due by 5/28/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Jacobson, Brian) |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by USAA Casualty Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent United Services Automobile Association, Other Affiliate Xpress Restoration Inc for USAA Casualty Insurance Company (Jacobson, Brian) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (isc) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11627538, filed by USAA Casualty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C)(Jacobson, Brian) Text Modified on 5/8/2019 (cds). No Answer/Motion To Dismiss Filed. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
