Hashayev v. Citibank, N.A.
| Raphael Hashayev |
| Citibank, N.A. |
| 1:2019cv21955 |
| May 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Robert N Scola |
| Edwin G Torres |
| Consumer Credit |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0151 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
Judgment in a Civil Action re #8 ORDER DISMISSING CASE; Case remains Closed Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 07/12/2019. See attached document for full details. (jao)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER DISMISSING CASE re: #7 Order to File a Motion for the Entry of a Clerk's Default. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 07/11/2019. See attached document for full details. (jao)
|
|
Filing 7
Order on Clerks Default Procedure; Plaintiff to submit a Motion for Entry of Clerks Default by July 8, 2019 Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 6/27/2019. See attached document for full details. (jao)
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Raphael Hashayev. Citibank, N.A. served on 6/3/2019, answer due 6/24/2019. (Zeig, Justin) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER SETTING DISCOVERY PROCEDURES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 6/4/2019. See attached document for full details. (mdc)
|
|
Filing 4
Order Requiring Discovery And Scheduling Conference And Order Referring Non-Dispositive Pretrial And Discovery Matters To The Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 05/24/2019. See attached document for full details. (jao)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Citibank, N.A.. (jao) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jao) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Citibank, N.A.. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11645270, filed by Raphael Hashayev. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Zeig, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hashayev v. Citibank, N.A. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Raphael Hashayev | |
| Represented By: | Justin E. Zeig |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Citibank, N.A. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
