Scotton v. Roy Van-Brunt et al
Plaintiff: Rogerio Chaves Scotton
Defendant: Does 1-10 and Roy Van-Brunt
Case Number: 1:2019cv21989
Filed: May 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Lisette M Reid
Referring Judge: Kathleen M Williams
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER denying #7 Motion for Extension of Time and Leave to pay Court Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 7/9/2019. See attached document for full details. (fbn)
July 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 PAPERLESS ORDER denying #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. See ECF #6 (denying Plaintiff's Motion). Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 7/9/2019. (ac01)
July 8, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time/To Leave To Pay the Court Fees by Rogerio Chaves Scotton. Responses due by 7/22/2019 (cds)
June 26, 2019 Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS on 42 USC 1983 case re #1 Complaint 42 USC 1983 or Bivens filed by Rogerio Chaves Scotton, #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Rogerio Chaves Scotton; Recommending that: 1. Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis ECF #3 is DENIED. 2. Plaintiff's Complaint ECF #1 be DISMISSED, without prejudice. 3. The case be CLOSED. Objections to R&R due by 7/10/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 6/26/2019. See attached document for full details. (fbn)
June 4, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE for the Clerk of the Court by Rogerio Chaves Scotton (lh)
May 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE CIVIL RIGHTS LITIGANTS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 5/21/2019. See attached document for full details. (fbn)
May 16, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rogerio Chaves Scotton. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Resident Funds Inquiry)(cds)
May 16, 2019 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams and Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-2, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. (cds)
May 16, 2019 Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Does 1-10, Roy Van-Brunt. Filing fee $ 400.00. (IFP Filed), filed by Rogerio Chaves Scotton.(cds)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scotton v. Roy Van-Brunt et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roy Van-Brunt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rogerio Chaves Scotton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?