Perez v. Eyetrust Vision LLC et al
Melissa Perez |
Mathew Chrycy and Eyetrust Vision LLC |
1:2019cv22001 |
May 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Ursula Ungaro |
Labor: Fair Standards |
15 U.S.C. ยง 0002 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Statement of: Response to Statement of Claim by Mathew Chrycy, Eyetrust Vision LLC re #9 Statement (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Login and Logout Summary)(Entin, Joshua) |
Filing 10 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by Mathew Chrycy, Eyetrust Vision LLC (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Exhibit A)(Elkins, Michael) |
Filing 9 Statement of: of Plaintiff's Statement of Claim by Melissa Perez re #6 Scheduling Order,, (Georges-Pierre, Anthony) |
Filing 8 ORDER setting settlement conference, (Settlement Conference set for 7/26/2019 10:30 AM in Miami Division before Ch. Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan). Signed by Ch. Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan on 6/6/2019. See attached document for full details. (mkr) |
Filing 7 ORDER AND REFERRAL IN ACTIONS BROUGHT UNDER THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Ch. Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan for Settlement., ( Statement of Claim due by 6/28/2019.) Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 6/5/2019. See attached document for full details. (amb) |
Filing 6 ORDER SETTING INITIAL PLANNING AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE. SCHEDULING ORDER: Joint Planning and Scheduling Report due by 6/28/2019. Initial Planning and Scheduling Conference set for 7/12/2019 10:30 AM in Miami Division before Judge Ursula Ungaro. Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 6/5/2019. See attached document for full details. (amb) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here. |
Filing 5 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint re the Notice of Removal by Mathew Chrycy, Eyetrust Vision LLC. (Entin, Joshua) |
Filing 4 ORDER Requiring Response to Complaint re #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), filed by Mathew Chrycy, Eyetrust Vision LLC, Mathew Chrycy response due 5/24/2019; Eyetrust Vision LLC response due 5/24/2019. Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 5/21/2019. See attached document for full details. (ail) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael Lewis Elkins on behalf of Mathew Chrycy, Eyetrust Vision LLC. Attorney Michael Lewis Elkins added to party Mathew Chrycy(pty:dft), Attorney Michael Lewis Elkins added to party Eyetrust Vision LLC(pty:dft). (Elkins, Michael) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Ursula Ungaro. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (amb) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11655137, filed by Mathew Chrycy, Eyetrust Vision LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Entin, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.