Almeida v. Berryhill
| Nerva Almeida |
| Nancy A Berryhill |
| 1:2019cv22013 |
| May 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Edwin G Torres |
| Kathleen M Williams |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by Nerva Almeida. US Attorney General served on 5/29/2019, answer due 7/29/2019. (Palacios-Paredes, Katherine) Modified text on 6/14/2019 (jas). |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by Nerva Almeida. Commissioner, Social Security Administration served on 5/28/2019, answer due 7/29/2019. (Palacios-Paredes, Katherine) Modified text on 6/14/2019 (jas). |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by Nerva Almeida. US Attorney served on 5/28/2019, answer due 7/29/2019. (Palacios-Paredes, Katherine) Modified text on 6/14/2019 (jas). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Katherine Olivia Palacios-Paredes on behalf of Nerva Almeida. Attorney Katherine Olivia Palacios-Paredes added to party Nerva Almeida(pty:pla). (Palacios-Paredes, Katherine) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Nancy A Berryhill. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s), #2 Summon(s))(ebz) |
| Filing 5 Clerks Notice of Magistrate Judge Assignment to Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres. Pursuant to the Clerks directive of this cause, this matter is referred for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. (asl) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ebz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Nerva Almeida against Nancy A Berryhill. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11656544, filed by Nerva Almeida. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Oliver, Rogelio) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Almeida v. Berryhill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nerva Almeida | |
| Represented By: | Rogelio Ramon Oliver |
| Represented By: | Katherine Olivia Palacios-Paredes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nancy A Berryhill | |
| Represented By: | Noticing Social Security US Attorney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
